{"id":62631,"date":"2026-06-20T15:26:13","date_gmt":"2026-06-20T20:26:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/?p=62631"},"modified":"2026-07-03T14:42:13","modified_gmt":"2026-07-03T19:42:13","slug":"con-base-en-el-dictamen-acusatorio-de-fiscalia-exjuez-es-llamado-a-juicio-por-presunto-prevaricato","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/con-base-en-el-dictamen-acusatorio-de-fiscalia-exjuez-es-llamado-a-juicio-por-presunto-prevaricato\/","title":{"rendered":"Con base en el dictamen acusatorio de Fiscal\u00eda, exjuez es llamado a juicio por presunto prevaricato"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><button class=\"responsivevoice-button\" type=\"button\" title=\"ResponsiveVoice Tap to Start\/Stop Speech\" data-rvtts-action=\"speak\" data-rvtts-text=\"BOLET\u00cdN DE PRENSA FGE N\u00ba 756-DC-2026 Con base en el dictamen acusatorio de Fiscal\u00eda, exjuez es llamado a juicio por presunto prevaricato\" data-rvtts-voice=\"Spanish Latin American Female\" data-rvtts-brand-url=\"https:\/\/responsivevoice.org\/?utm_source=wordpress-plugin&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=powered-by\" data-rvtts-brand-label=\"Powered by ResponsiveVoice\"><svg class=\"rvtts-icon\" width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"currentColor\" aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" clip-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M11 0C4.92345 0 0 4.92345 0 11C0 13.2683 0.690345 15.3772 1.86621 17.1221L0.811724 21.0517L4.70345 20.0124C6.48621 21.2641 8.65586 22 11 22C17.0766 22 22 17.0766 22 11C22 4.92345 17.0766 0 11 0ZM3.99793 9.99862C3.99793 9.44483 4.44552 8.99724 4.99931 8.99724C5.5531 8.99724 6.00069 9.44483 6.00069 9.99862V12.0014C6.00069 12.5552 5.5531 13.0028 4.99931 13.0028C4.44552 13.0028 3.99793 12.5552 3.99793 12.0014V9.99862ZM8.99724 13.9966C8.99724 14.5503 8.54966 14.9979 7.99586 14.9979C7.44207 14.9979 6.99448 14.5503 6.99448 13.9966V7.99586C6.99448 7.44207 7.44207 6.99448 7.99586 6.99448C8.54966 6.99448 8.99724 7.44207 8.99724 7.99586V13.9966ZM12.0014 17.0007C12.0014 17.5545 11.5538 18.0021 11 18.0021C10.4462 18.0021 9.99862 17.5545 9.99862 17.0007V4.99931C9.99862 4.44552 10.4462 3.99793 11 3.99793C11.5538 3.99793 12.0014 4.44552 12.0014 4.99931V17.0007ZM14.9979 13.9966C14.9979 14.5503 14.5503 14.9979 13.9966 14.9979C13.4428 14.9979 12.9952 14.5503 12.9952 13.9966V7.99586C12.9952 7.44207 13.4428 6.99448 13.9966 6.99448C14.5503 6.99448 14.9979 7.44207 14.9979 7.99586V13.9966ZM18.0021 12.0014C18.0021 12.5552 17.5545 13.0028 17.0007 13.0028C16.4469 13.0028 15.9993 12.5552 15.9993 12.0014V9.99862C15.9993 9.44483 16.4469 8.99724 17.0007 8.99724C17.5545 8.99724 18.0021 9.44483 18.0021 9.99862V12.0014Z\"\/><\/svg><span class=\"responsivevoice-button__label\"><\/span><\/button> <br \/>\n<strong>BOLET\u00cdN DE PRENSA FGE N\u00ba 756-DC-2026<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Con base en el dictamen acusatorio de Fiscal\u00eda, exjuez es llamado a juicio por presunto prevaricato<\/strong><br \/>\n<br \/>\n<button class=\"responsivevoice-button\" type=\"button\" title=\"ResponsiveVoice Tap to Start\/Stop Speech\" data-rvtts-action=\"speak\" data-rvtts-text=\"Guayaquil (Guayas), 20 de junio de 2026.- Segundo Orlando T. A. fue llamado a juicio como presunto autor del delito de prevaricato. El exfuncionario habr\u00eda ordenado, desde Guayaquil y sin competencia ni motivaci\u00f3n t\u00e9cnica suficiente, el cierre de una instrucci\u00f3n fiscal que se tramitaba en Quito.\" data-rvtts-voice=\"Spanish Latin American Female\" data-rvtts-brand-url=\"https:\/\/responsivevoice.org\/?utm_source=wordpress-plugin&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=powered-by\" data-rvtts-brand-label=\"Powered by ResponsiveVoice\"><svg class=\"rvtts-icon\" width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"currentColor\" aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" clip-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M11 0C4.92345 0 0 4.92345 0 11C0 13.2683 0.690345 15.3772 1.86621 17.1221L0.811724 21.0517L4.70345 20.0124C6.48621 21.2641 8.65586 22 11 22C17.0766 22 22 17.0766 22 11C22 4.92345 17.0766 0 11 0ZM3.99793 9.99862C3.99793 9.44483 4.44552 8.99724 4.99931 8.99724C5.5531 8.99724 6.00069 9.44483 6.00069 9.99862V12.0014C6.00069 12.5552 5.5531 13.0028 4.99931 13.0028C4.44552 13.0028 3.99793 12.5552 3.99793 12.0014V9.99862ZM8.99724 13.9966C8.99724 14.5503 8.54966 14.9979 7.99586 14.9979C7.44207 14.9979 6.99448 14.5503 6.99448 13.9966V7.99586C6.99448 7.44207 7.44207 6.99448 7.99586 6.99448C8.54966 6.99448 8.99724 7.44207 8.99724 7.99586V13.9966ZM12.0014 17.0007C12.0014 17.5545 11.5538 18.0021 11 18.0021C10.4462 18.0021 9.99862 17.5545 9.99862 17.0007V4.99931C9.99862 4.44552 10.4462 3.99793 11 3.99793C11.5538 3.99793 12.0014 4.44552 12.0014 4.99931V17.0007ZM14.9979 13.9966C14.9979 14.5503 14.5503 14.9979 13.9966 14.9979C13.4428 14.9979 12.9952 14.5503 12.9952 13.9966V7.99586C12.9952 7.44207 13.4428 6.99448 13.9966 6.99448C14.5503 6.99448 14.9979 7.44207 14.9979 7.99586V13.9966ZM18.0021 12.0014C18.0021 12.5552 17.5545 13.0028 17.0007 13.0028C16.4469 13.0028 15.9993 12.5552 15.9993 12.0014V9.99862C15.9993 9.44483 16.4469 8.99724 17.0007 8.99724C17.5545 8.99724 18.0021 9.44483 18.0021 9.99862V12.0014Z\"\/><\/svg><span class=\"responsivevoice-button__label\"><\/span><\/button> <br \/>\n<strong>Guayaquil (Guayas), 20 de junio de 2026.-<\/strong> Segundo Orlando T. A. fue llamado a juicio como presunto autor del delito de prevaricato. El exfuncionario habr\u00eda ordenado, desde Guayaquil y sin competencia ni motivaci\u00f3n t\u00e9cnica suficiente, el cierre de una instrucci\u00f3n fiscal que se tramitaba en Quito.<br \/>\n<br \/>\n<button class=\"responsivevoice-button\" type=\"button\" title=\"ResponsiveVoice Tap to Start\/Stop Speech\" data-rvtts-action=\"speak\" data-rvtts-text=\"Durante la audiencia evaluatoria y preparatoria de juicio, la Fiscal provincial de Pichincha, Alexandra Zurita Lucero, emiti\u00f3 su dictamen acusatorio contra el Exmagistrado de la Unidad Judicial de Violencia contra la Mujer o Miembros del N\u00facleo Familiar de Guayaquil Sur, sustentado en catorce elementos de convicci\u00f3n.\" data-rvtts-voice=\"Spanish Latin American Female\" data-rvtts-brand-url=\"https:\/\/responsivevoice.org\/?utm_source=wordpress-plugin&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=powered-by\" data-rvtts-brand-label=\"Powered by ResponsiveVoice\"><svg class=\"rvtts-icon\" width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"currentColor\" aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" clip-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M11 0C4.92345 0 0 4.92345 0 11C0 13.2683 0.690345 15.3772 1.86621 17.1221L0.811724 21.0517L4.70345 20.0124C6.48621 21.2641 8.65586 22 11 22C17.0766 22 22 17.0766 22 11C22 4.92345 17.0766 0 11 0ZM3.99793 9.99862C3.99793 9.44483 4.44552 8.99724 4.99931 8.99724C5.5531 8.99724 6.00069 9.44483 6.00069 9.99862V12.0014C6.00069 12.5552 5.5531 13.0028 4.99931 13.0028C4.44552 13.0028 3.99793 12.5552 3.99793 12.0014V9.99862ZM8.99724 13.9966C8.99724 14.5503 8.54966 14.9979 7.99586 14.9979C7.44207 14.9979 6.99448 14.5503 6.99448 13.9966V7.99586C6.99448 7.44207 7.44207 6.99448 7.99586 6.99448C8.54966 6.99448 8.99724 7.44207 8.99724 7.99586V13.9966ZM12.0014 17.0007C12.0014 17.5545 11.5538 18.0021 11 18.0021C10.4462 18.0021 9.99862 17.5545 9.99862 17.0007V4.99931C9.99862 4.44552 10.4462 3.99793 11 3.99793C11.5538 3.99793 12.0014 4.44552 12.0014 4.99931V17.0007ZM14.9979 13.9966C14.9979 14.5503 14.5503 14.9979 13.9966 14.9979C13.4428 14.9979 12.9952 14.5503 12.9952 13.9966V7.99586C12.9952 7.44207 13.4428 6.99448 13.9966 6.99448C14.5503 6.99448 14.9979 7.44207 14.9979 7.99586V13.9966ZM18.0021 12.0014C18.0021 12.5552 17.5545 13.0028 17.0007 13.0028C16.4469 13.0028 15.9993 12.5552 15.9993 12.0014V9.99862C15.9993 9.44483 16.4469 8.99724 17.0007 8.99724C17.5545 8.99724 18.0021 9.44483 18.0021 9.99862V12.0014Z\"\/><\/svg><span class=\"responsivevoice-button__label\"><\/span><\/button> <br \/>\nDurante la audiencia evaluatoria y preparatoria de juicio, la Fiscal provincial de Pichincha, Alexandra Zurita Lucero, emiti\u00f3 su dictamen acusatorio contra el Exmagistrado de la Unidad Judicial de Violencia contra la Mujer o Miembros del N\u00facleo Familiar de Guayaquil Sur, sustentado en catorce elementos de convicci\u00f3n.<br \/>\n<br \/>\n<button class=\"responsivevoice-button\" type=\"button\" title=\"ResponsiveVoice Tap to Start\/Stop Speech\" data-rvtts-action=\"speak\" data-rvtts-text=\"En el transcurso de la diligencia, desarrollada de forma telem\u00e1tica, la Fiscal explic\u00f3 ante el Presidente de la Corte Provincial de Justicia de Guayas que, el 20 de diciembre de 2024, Yina F., representante de La Uni\u00f3n Compa\u00f1\u00eda de Seguros S. A., present\u00f3 una acci\u00f3n constitucional de medida cautelar que fue sorteada en el despacho del ahora procesado.\" data-rvtts-voice=\"Spanish Latin American Female\" data-rvtts-brand-url=\"https:\/\/responsivevoice.org\/?utm_source=wordpress-plugin&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=powered-by\" data-rvtts-brand-label=\"Powered by ResponsiveVoice\"><svg class=\"rvtts-icon\" width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"currentColor\" aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" clip-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M11 0C4.92345 0 0 4.92345 0 11C0 13.2683 0.690345 15.3772 1.86621 17.1221L0.811724 21.0517L4.70345 20.0124C6.48621 21.2641 8.65586 22 11 22C17.0766 22 22 17.0766 22 11C22 4.92345 17.0766 0 11 0ZM3.99793 9.99862C3.99793 9.44483 4.44552 8.99724 4.99931 8.99724C5.5531 8.99724 6.00069 9.44483 6.00069 9.99862V12.0014C6.00069 12.5552 5.5531 13.0028 4.99931 13.0028C4.44552 13.0028 3.99793 12.5552 3.99793 12.0014V9.99862ZM8.99724 13.9966C8.99724 14.5503 8.54966 14.9979 7.99586 14.9979C7.44207 14.9979 6.99448 14.5503 6.99448 13.9966V7.99586C6.99448 7.44207 7.44207 6.99448 7.99586 6.99448C8.54966 6.99448 8.99724 7.44207 8.99724 7.99586V13.9966ZM12.0014 17.0007C12.0014 17.5545 11.5538 18.0021 11 18.0021C10.4462 18.0021 9.99862 17.5545 9.99862 17.0007V4.99931C9.99862 4.44552 10.4462 3.99793 11 3.99793C11.5538 3.99793 12.0014 4.44552 12.0014 4.99931V17.0007ZM14.9979 13.9966C14.9979 14.5503 14.5503 14.9979 13.9966 14.9979C13.4428 14.9979 12.9952 14.5503 12.9952 13.9966V7.99586C12.9952 7.44207 13.4428 6.99448 13.9966 6.99448C14.5503 6.99448 14.9979 7.44207 14.9979 7.99586V13.9966ZM18.0021 12.0014C18.0021 12.5552 17.5545 13.0028 17.0007 13.0028C16.4469 13.0028 15.9993 12.5552 15.9993 12.0014V9.99862C15.9993 9.44483 16.4469 8.99724 17.0007 8.99724C17.5545 8.99724 18.0021 9.44483 18.0021 9.99862V12.0014Z\"\/><\/svg><span class=\"responsivevoice-button__label\"><\/span><\/button> <br \/>\nEn el transcurso de la diligencia, desarrollada de forma telem\u00e1tica, la Fiscal explic\u00f3 ante el Presidente de la Corte Provincial de Justicia de Guayas que, el 20 de diciembre de 2024, Yina F., representante de La Uni\u00f3n Compa\u00f1\u00eda de Seguros S. A., present\u00f3 una acci\u00f3n constitucional de medida cautelar que fue sorteada en el despacho del ahora procesado.<br \/>\n<br \/>\n<button class=\"responsivevoice-button\" type=\"button\" title=\"ResponsiveVoice Tap to Start\/Stop Speech\" data-rvtts-action=\"speak\" data-rvtts-text=\"Dicha acci\u00f3n fue planteada en contra de un agente fiscal de la Unidad de Transparencia y Lucha contra la Corrupci\u00f3n de la Fiscal\u00eda General del Estado. En su petici\u00f3n, Yina F. solicit\u00f3, como medida cautelar, que se ordenara al fiscal demandado \u201cel cierre inmediato y sin dilaci\u00f3n de ning\u00fan tipo\u201d de una instrucci\u00f3n fiscal seguida en su contra por presunto peculado, delito contra la eficiencia de la administraci\u00f3n p\u00fablica.\" data-rvtts-voice=\"Spanish Latin American Female\" data-rvtts-brand-url=\"https:\/\/responsivevoice.org\/?utm_source=wordpress-plugin&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=powered-by\" data-rvtts-brand-label=\"Powered by ResponsiveVoice\"><svg class=\"rvtts-icon\" width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"currentColor\" aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" clip-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M11 0C4.92345 0 0 4.92345 0 11C0 13.2683 0.690345 15.3772 1.86621 17.1221L0.811724 21.0517L4.70345 20.0124C6.48621 21.2641 8.65586 22 11 22C17.0766 22 22 17.0766 22 11C22 4.92345 17.0766 0 11 0ZM3.99793 9.99862C3.99793 9.44483 4.44552 8.99724 4.99931 8.99724C5.5531 8.99724 6.00069 9.44483 6.00069 9.99862V12.0014C6.00069 12.5552 5.5531 13.0028 4.99931 13.0028C4.44552 13.0028 3.99793 12.5552 3.99793 12.0014V9.99862ZM8.99724 13.9966C8.99724 14.5503 8.54966 14.9979 7.99586 14.9979C7.44207 14.9979 6.99448 14.5503 6.99448 13.9966V7.99586C6.99448 7.44207 7.44207 6.99448 7.99586 6.99448C8.54966 6.99448 8.99724 7.44207 8.99724 7.99586V13.9966ZM12.0014 17.0007C12.0014 17.5545 11.5538 18.0021 11 18.0021C10.4462 18.0021 9.99862 17.5545 9.99862 17.0007V4.99931C9.99862 4.44552 10.4462 3.99793 11 3.99793C11.5538 3.99793 12.0014 4.44552 12.0014 4.99931V17.0007ZM14.9979 13.9966C14.9979 14.5503 14.5503 14.9979 13.9966 14.9979C13.4428 14.9979 12.9952 14.5503 12.9952 13.9966V7.99586C12.9952 7.44207 13.4428 6.99448 13.9966 6.99448C14.5503 6.99448 14.9979 7.44207 14.9979 7.99586V13.9966ZM18.0021 12.0014C18.0021 12.5552 17.5545 13.0028 17.0007 13.0028C16.4469 13.0028 15.9993 12.5552 15.9993 12.0014V9.99862C15.9993 9.44483 16.4469 8.99724 17.0007 8.99724C17.5545 8.99724 18.0021 9.44483 18.0021 9.99862V12.0014Z\"\/><\/svg><span class=\"responsivevoice-button__label\"><\/span><\/button> <br \/>\nDicha acci\u00f3n fue planteada en contra de un agente fiscal de la Unidad de Transparencia y Lucha contra la Corrupci\u00f3n de la Fiscal\u00eda General del Estado.<\/p>\n<p>En su petici\u00f3n, Yina F. solicit\u00f3, como medida cautelar, que se ordenara al fiscal demandado \u201cel cierre inmediato y sin dilaci\u00f3n de ning\u00fan tipo\u201d de una instrucci\u00f3n fiscal seguida en su contra por presunto peculado, delito contra la eficiencia de la administraci\u00f3n p\u00fablica.<br \/>\n<br \/>\n<button class=\"responsivevoice-button\" type=\"button\" title=\"ResponsiveVoice Tap to Start\/Stop Speech\" data-rvtts-action=\"speak\" data-rvtts-text=\"Seg\u00fan expuso Fiscal\u00eda, sin solicitar prueba alguna ni requerir informaci\u00f3n a la parte accionada, el entonces juez Segundo Orlando T. acept\u00f3 la medida cautelar, desnaturalizando as\u00ed una garant\u00eda jurisdiccional. La resoluci\u00f3n fue emitida la tarde del 23 de diciembre de 2024. Fiscal\u00eda enfatiz\u00f3 que el procesado conoc\u00eda que la causa por peculado se tramitaba ante un juez de la Unidad Anticorrupci\u00f3n, en Quito.\" data-rvtts-voice=\"Spanish Latin American Female\" data-rvtts-brand-url=\"https:\/\/responsivevoice.org\/?utm_source=wordpress-plugin&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=powered-by\" data-rvtts-brand-label=\"Powered by ResponsiveVoice\"><svg class=\"rvtts-icon\" width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"currentColor\" aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" clip-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M11 0C4.92345 0 0 4.92345 0 11C0 13.2683 0.690345 15.3772 1.86621 17.1221L0.811724 21.0517L4.70345 20.0124C6.48621 21.2641 8.65586 22 11 22C17.0766 22 22 17.0766 22 11C22 4.92345 17.0766 0 11 0ZM3.99793 9.99862C3.99793 9.44483 4.44552 8.99724 4.99931 8.99724C5.5531 8.99724 6.00069 9.44483 6.00069 9.99862V12.0014C6.00069 12.5552 5.5531 13.0028 4.99931 13.0028C4.44552 13.0028 3.99793 12.5552 3.99793 12.0014V9.99862ZM8.99724 13.9966C8.99724 14.5503 8.54966 14.9979 7.99586 14.9979C7.44207 14.9979 6.99448 14.5503 6.99448 13.9966V7.99586C6.99448 7.44207 7.44207 6.99448 7.99586 6.99448C8.54966 6.99448 8.99724 7.44207 8.99724 7.99586V13.9966ZM12.0014 17.0007C12.0014 17.5545 11.5538 18.0021 11 18.0021C10.4462 18.0021 9.99862 17.5545 9.99862 17.0007V4.99931C9.99862 4.44552 10.4462 3.99793 11 3.99793C11.5538 3.99793 12.0014 4.44552 12.0014 4.99931V17.0007ZM14.9979 13.9966C14.9979 14.5503 14.5503 14.9979 13.9966 14.9979C13.4428 14.9979 12.9952 14.5503 12.9952 13.9966V7.99586C12.9952 7.44207 13.4428 6.99448 13.9966 6.99448C14.5503 6.99448 14.9979 7.44207 14.9979 7.99586V13.9966ZM18.0021 12.0014C18.0021 12.5552 17.5545 13.0028 17.0007 13.0028C16.4469 13.0028 15.9993 12.5552 15.9993 12.0014V9.99862C15.9993 9.44483 16.4469 8.99724 17.0007 8.99724C17.5545 8.99724 18.0021 9.44483 18.0021 9.99862V12.0014Z\"\/><\/svg><span class=\"responsivevoice-button__label\"><\/span><\/button> <br \/>\nSeg\u00fan expuso Fiscal\u00eda, sin solicitar prueba alguna ni requerir informaci\u00f3n a la parte accionada, el entonces juez Segundo Orlando T. acept\u00f3 la medida cautelar, desnaturalizando as\u00ed una garant\u00eda jurisdiccional.<\/p>\n<p>La resoluci\u00f3n fue emitida la tarde del 23 de diciembre de 2024. Fiscal\u00eda enfatiz\u00f3 que el procesado conoc\u00eda que la causa por peculado se tramitaba ante un juez de la Unidad Anticorrupci\u00f3n, en Quito.<br \/>\n<br \/>\n<button class=\"responsivevoice-button\" type=\"button\" title=\"ResponsiveVoice Tap to Start\/Stop Speech\" data-rvtts-action=\"speak\" data-rvtts-text=\"Por ello, su decisi\u00f3n habr\u00eda contravenido el art\u00edculo 599 del C\u00f3digo Org\u00e1nico Integral Penal (COIP), que establece que una instrucci\u00f3n fiscal solo puede cerrarse por orden del juzgador penal que conoce la causa y \u00fanicamente cuando el agente fiscal no lo haya hecho.\" data-rvtts-voice=\"Spanish Latin American Female\" data-rvtts-brand-url=\"https:\/\/responsivevoice.org\/?utm_source=wordpress-plugin&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=powered-by\" data-rvtts-brand-label=\"Powered by ResponsiveVoice\"><svg class=\"rvtts-icon\" width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"currentColor\" aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" clip-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M11 0C4.92345 0 0 4.92345 0 11C0 13.2683 0.690345 15.3772 1.86621 17.1221L0.811724 21.0517L4.70345 20.0124C6.48621 21.2641 8.65586 22 11 22C17.0766 22 22 17.0766 22 11C22 4.92345 17.0766 0 11 0ZM3.99793 9.99862C3.99793 9.44483 4.44552 8.99724 4.99931 8.99724C5.5531 8.99724 6.00069 9.44483 6.00069 9.99862V12.0014C6.00069 12.5552 5.5531 13.0028 4.99931 13.0028C4.44552 13.0028 3.99793 12.5552 3.99793 12.0014V9.99862ZM8.99724 13.9966C8.99724 14.5503 8.54966 14.9979 7.99586 14.9979C7.44207 14.9979 6.99448 14.5503 6.99448 13.9966V7.99586C6.99448 7.44207 7.44207 6.99448 7.99586 6.99448C8.54966 6.99448 8.99724 7.44207 8.99724 7.99586V13.9966ZM12.0014 17.0007C12.0014 17.5545 11.5538 18.0021 11 18.0021C10.4462 18.0021 9.99862 17.5545 9.99862 17.0007V4.99931C9.99862 4.44552 10.4462 3.99793 11 3.99793C11.5538 3.99793 12.0014 4.44552 12.0014 4.99931V17.0007ZM14.9979 13.9966C14.9979 14.5503 14.5503 14.9979 13.9966 14.9979C13.4428 14.9979 12.9952 14.5503 12.9952 13.9966V7.99586C12.9952 7.44207 13.4428 6.99448 13.9966 6.99448C14.5503 6.99448 14.9979 7.44207 14.9979 7.99586V13.9966ZM18.0021 12.0014C18.0021 12.5552 17.5545 13.0028 17.0007 13.0028C16.4469 13.0028 15.9993 12.5552 15.9993 12.0014V9.99862C15.9993 9.44483 16.4469 8.99724 17.0007 8.99724C17.5545 8.99724 18.0021 9.44483 18.0021 9.99862V12.0014Z\"\/><\/svg><span class=\"responsivevoice-button__label\"><\/span><\/button> <br \/>\nPor ello, su decisi\u00f3n habr\u00eda contravenido el art\u00edculo 599 del C\u00f3digo Org\u00e1nico Integral Penal (COIP), que establece que una instrucci\u00f3n fiscal solo puede cerrarse por orden del juzgador penal que conoce la causa y \u00fanicamente cuando el agente fiscal no lo haya hecho.<br \/>\n<br \/>\n<button class=\"responsivevoice-button\" type=\"button\" title=\"ResponsiveVoice Tap to Start\/Stop Speech\" data-rvtts-action=\"speak\" data-rvtts-text=\"En ese contexto, la Fiscal Provincial sostuvo que Segundo Orlando T. A., en su calidad de juez en Guayaquil, no ten\u00eda competencia para ordenar el cierre de una instrucci\u00f3n fiscal que estaba a cargo de un magistrado en Quito. El Juez Provincial tambi\u00e9n ratific\u00f3 las medidas cautelares de prohibici\u00f3n de salida del pa\u00eds y presentaci\u00f3n peri\u00f3dica.\" data-rvtts-voice=\"Spanish Latin American Female\" data-rvtts-brand-url=\"https:\/\/responsivevoice.org\/?utm_source=wordpress-plugin&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=powered-by\" data-rvtts-brand-label=\"Powered by ResponsiveVoice\"><svg class=\"rvtts-icon\" width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"currentColor\" aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" clip-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M11 0C4.92345 0 0 4.92345 0 11C0 13.2683 0.690345 15.3772 1.86621 17.1221L0.811724 21.0517L4.70345 20.0124C6.48621 21.2641 8.65586 22 11 22C17.0766 22 22 17.0766 22 11C22 4.92345 17.0766 0 11 0ZM3.99793 9.99862C3.99793 9.44483 4.44552 8.99724 4.99931 8.99724C5.5531 8.99724 6.00069 9.44483 6.00069 9.99862V12.0014C6.00069 12.5552 5.5531 13.0028 4.99931 13.0028C4.44552 13.0028 3.99793 12.5552 3.99793 12.0014V9.99862ZM8.99724 13.9966C8.99724 14.5503 8.54966 14.9979 7.99586 14.9979C7.44207 14.9979 6.99448 14.5503 6.99448 13.9966V7.99586C6.99448 7.44207 7.44207 6.99448 7.99586 6.99448C8.54966 6.99448 8.99724 7.44207 8.99724 7.99586V13.9966ZM12.0014 17.0007C12.0014 17.5545 11.5538 18.0021 11 18.0021C10.4462 18.0021 9.99862 17.5545 9.99862 17.0007V4.99931C9.99862 4.44552 10.4462 3.99793 11 3.99793C11.5538 3.99793 12.0014 4.44552 12.0014 4.99931V17.0007ZM14.9979 13.9966C14.9979 14.5503 14.5503 14.9979 13.9966 14.9979C13.4428 14.9979 12.9952 14.5503 12.9952 13.9966V7.99586C12.9952 7.44207 13.4428 6.99448 13.9966 6.99448C14.5503 6.99448 14.9979 7.44207 14.9979 7.99586V13.9966ZM18.0021 12.0014C18.0021 12.5552 17.5545 13.0028 17.0007 13.0028C16.4469 13.0028 15.9993 12.5552 15.9993 12.0014V9.99862C15.9993 9.44483 16.4469 8.99724 17.0007 8.99724C17.5545 8.99724 18.0021 9.44483 18.0021 9.99862V12.0014Z\"\/><\/svg><span class=\"responsivevoice-button__label\"><\/span><\/button> <br \/>\nEn ese contexto, la Fiscal Provincial sostuvo que Segundo Orlando T. A., en su calidad de juez en Guayaquil, no ten\u00eda competencia para ordenar el cierre de una instrucci\u00f3n fiscal que estaba a cargo de un magistrado en Quito.<\/p>\n<p>El Juez Provincial tambi\u00e9n ratific\u00f3 las medidas cautelares de prohibici\u00f3n de salida del pa\u00eds y presentaci\u00f3n peri\u00f3dica.<br \/>\n<br \/>\n<button class=\"responsivevoice-button\" type=\"button\" title=\"ResponsiveVoice Tap to Start\/Stop Speech\" data-rvtts-action=\"speak\" data-rvtts-text=\"Informaci\u00f3n jur\u00eddica El art\u00edculo 268 del C\u00f3digo Org\u00e1nico Integral Penal (COIP) sanciona el delito de prevaricato con pena privativa de libertad de cinco a siete a\u00f1os. La pena se incrementa de siete a diez a\u00f1os cuando el delito es cometido por jueces, \u00e1rbitros o miembros de la Funci\u00f3n Judicial que fallen contra ley expresa en perjuicio de una de las partes o favorezcan a un grupo de delincuencia organizada o en delitos contra la eficiencia de la administraci\u00f3n p\u00fablica.\" data-rvtts-voice=\"Spanish Latin American Female\" data-rvtts-brand-url=\"https:\/\/responsivevoice.org\/?utm_source=wordpress-plugin&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=powered-by\" data-rvtts-brand-label=\"Powered by ResponsiveVoice\"><svg class=\"rvtts-icon\" width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"currentColor\" aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" clip-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M11 0C4.92345 0 0 4.92345 0 11C0 13.2683 0.690345 15.3772 1.86621 17.1221L0.811724 21.0517L4.70345 20.0124C6.48621 21.2641 8.65586 22 11 22C17.0766 22 22 17.0766 22 11C22 4.92345 17.0766 0 11 0ZM3.99793 9.99862C3.99793 9.44483 4.44552 8.99724 4.99931 8.99724C5.5531 8.99724 6.00069 9.44483 6.00069 9.99862V12.0014C6.00069 12.5552 5.5531 13.0028 4.99931 13.0028C4.44552 13.0028 3.99793 12.5552 3.99793 12.0014V9.99862ZM8.99724 13.9966C8.99724 14.5503 8.54966 14.9979 7.99586 14.9979C7.44207 14.9979 6.99448 14.5503 6.99448 13.9966V7.99586C6.99448 7.44207 7.44207 6.99448 7.99586 6.99448C8.54966 6.99448 8.99724 7.44207 8.99724 7.99586V13.9966ZM12.0014 17.0007C12.0014 17.5545 11.5538 18.0021 11 18.0021C10.4462 18.0021 9.99862 17.5545 9.99862 17.0007V4.99931C9.99862 4.44552 10.4462 3.99793 11 3.99793C11.5538 3.99793 12.0014 4.44552 12.0014 4.99931V17.0007ZM14.9979 13.9966C14.9979 14.5503 14.5503 14.9979 13.9966 14.9979C13.4428 14.9979 12.9952 14.5503 12.9952 13.9966V7.99586C12.9952 7.44207 13.4428 6.99448 13.9966 6.99448C14.5503 6.99448 14.9979 7.44207 14.9979 7.99586V13.9966ZM18.0021 12.0014C18.0021 12.5552 17.5545 13.0028 17.0007 13.0028C16.4469 13.0028 15.9993 12.5552 15.9993 12.0014V9.99862C15.9993 9.44483 16.4469 8.99724 17.0007 8.99724C17.5545 8.99724 18.0021 9.44483 18.0021 9.99862V12.0014Z\"\/><\/svg><span class=\"responsivevoice-button__label\"><\/span><\/button> <br \/>\n<strong>Informaci\u00f3n jur\u00eddica<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>El art\u00edculo 268 del C\u00f3digo Org\u00e1nico Integral Penal (COIP) sanciona el delito de prevaricato con pena privativa de libertad de cinco a siete a\u00f1os.<\/p>\n<p>La pena se incrementa de siete a diez a\u00f1os cuando el delito es cometido por jueces, \u00e1rbitros o miembros de la Funci\u00f3n Judicial que fallen contra ley expresa en perjuicio de una de las partes o favorezcan a un grupo de delincuencia organizada o en delitos contra la eficiencia de la administraci\u00f3n p\u00fablica.<br \/>\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"BOLET\u00cdN DE PRENSA FGE N\u00ba 756-DC-2026 Con base en el dictamen acusatorio de Fiscal\u00eda, exjuez es llamado a juicio por presunto prevaricato Guayaquil (Guayas), 20 de junio de 2026.- Segundo Orlando T. A. fue llamado a juicio como presunto autor del delito de prevaricato. El...","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2296,2290],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-62631","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-junio-2026","category-2290"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62631","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=62631"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62631\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":62632,"href":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62631\/revisions\/62632"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=62631"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=62631"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=62631"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}