{"id":52690,"date":"2024-02-02T09:11:48","date_gmt":"2024-02-02T14:11:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/?p=52690"},"modified":"2024-02-02T15:18:10","modified_gmt":"2024-02-02T20:18:10","slug":"en-apelacion-fiscalia-logra-sentencia-de-17-anos-por-secuestro-extorsivo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/en-apelacion-fiscalia-logra-sentencia-de-17-anos-por-secuestro-extorsivo\/","title":{"rendered":"En apelaci\u00f3n, Fiscal\u00eda logra sentencia de 17 a\u00f1os por secuestro extorsivo"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><button class=\"responsivevoice-button\" type=\"button\" title=\"ResponsiveVoice Tap to Start\/Stop Speech\" data-rvtts-action=\"speak\" data-rvtts-text=\"BOLET\u00cdN DE PRENSA FGE N\u00ba 149-DC-2024 En apelaci\u00f3n, Fiscal\u00eda logra sentencia de 17 a\u00f1os por secuestro extorsivo\" data-rvtts-voice=\"Spanish Latin American Female\" data-rvtts-brand-url=\"https:\/\/responsivevoice.org\/?utm_source=wordpress-plugin&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=powered-by\" data-rvtts-brand-label=\"Powered by ResponsiveVoice\"><svg class=\"rvtts-icon\" width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"currentColor\" aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" clip-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M11 0C4.92345 0 0 4.92345 0 11C0 13.2683 0.690345 15.3772 1.86621 17.1221L0.811724 21.0517L4.70345 20.0124C6.48621 21.2641 8.65586 22 11 22C17.0766 22 22 17.0766 22 11C22 4.92345 17.0766 0 11 0ZM3.99793 9.99862C3.99793 9.44483 4.44552 8.99724 4.99931 8.99724C5.5531 8.99724 6.00069 9.44483 6.00069 9.99862V12.0014C6.00069 12.5552 5.5531 13.0028 4.99931 13.0028C4.44552 13.0028 3.99793 12.5552 3.99793 12.0014V9.99862ZM8.99724 13.9966C8.99724 14.5503 8.54966 14.9979 7.99586 14.9979C7.44207 14.9979 6.99448 14.5503 6.99448 13.9966V7.99586C6.99448 7.44207 7.44207 6.99448 7.99586 6.99448C8.54966 6.99448 8.99724 7.44207 8.99724 7.99586V13.9966ZM12.0014 17.0007C12.0014 17.5545 11.5538 18.0021 11 18.0021C10.4462 18.0021 9.99862 17.5545 9.99862 17.0007V4.99931C9.99862 4.44552 10.4462 3.99793 11 3.99793C11.5538 3.99793 12.0014 4.44552 12.0014 4.99931V17.0007ZM14.9979 13.9966C14.9979 14.5503 14.5503 14.9979 13.9966 14.9979C13.4428 14.9979 12.9952 14.5503 12.9952 13.9966V7.99586C12.9952 7.44207 13.4428 6.99448 13.9966 6.99448C14.5503 6.99448 14.9979 7.44207 14.9979 7.99586V13.9966ZM18.0021 12.0014C18.0021 12.5552 17.5545 13.0028 17.0007 13.0028C16.4469 13.0028 15.9993 12.5552 15.9993 12.0014V9.99862C15.9993 9.44483 16.4469 8.99724 17.0007 8.99724C17.5545 8.99724 18.0021 9.44483 18.0021 9.99862V12.0014Z\"\/><\/svg><span class=\"responsivevoice-button__label\"><\/span><\/button> <br \/>\n<strong>BOLET\u00cdN DE PRENSA FGE N\u00ba 149-DC-2024<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>En apelaci\u00f3n, Fiscal\u00eda logra sentencia de 17 a\u00f1os por secuestro extorsivo<\/strong><br \/>\n<br \/>\n<button class=\"responsivevoice-button\" type=\"button\" title=\"ResponsiveVoice Tap to Start\/Stop Speech\" data-rvtts-action=\"speak\" data-rvtts-text=\"Quito (Pichincha), 02 de febrero de 2024.- La Sala de lo Penal de la Corte Provincial de Justicia de Pichincha revoc\u00f3 el fallo de primera instancia, en el que Eduardo F. fue declarado inocente del delito de secuestro extorsivo. Fiscal\u00eda apel\u00f3 esa resoluci\u00f3n ante los jueces de segunda instancia, al considerar que no hubo una correcta valoraci\u00f3n de la prueba por parte del Tribunal de Garant\u00edas Penales.\" data-rvtts-voice=\"Spanish Latin American Female\" data-rvtts-brand-url=\"https:\/\/responsivevoice.org\/?utm_source=wordpress-plugin&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=powered-by\" data-rvtts-brand-label=\"Powered by ResponsiveVoice\"><svg class=\"rvtts-icon\" width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"currentColor\" aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" clip-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M11 0C4.92345 0 0 4.92345 0 11C0 13.2683 0.690345 15.3772 1.86621 17.1221L0.811724 21.0517L4.70345 20.0124C6.48621 21.2641 8.65586 22 11 22C17.0766 22 22 17.0766 22 11C22 4.92345 17.0766 0 11 0ZM3.99793 9.99862C3.99793 9.44483 4.44552 8.99724 4.99931 8.99724C5.5531 8.99724 6.00069 9.44483 6.00069 9.99862V12.0014C6.00069 12.5552 5.5531 13.0028 4.99931 13.0028C4.44552 13.0028 3.99793 12.5552 3.99793 12.0014V9.99862ZM8.99724 13.9966C8.99724 14.5503 8.54966 14.9979 7.99586 14.9979C7.44207 14.9979 6.99448 14.5503 6.99448 13.9966V7.99586C6.99448 7.44207 7.44207 6.99448 7.99586 6.99448C8.54966 6.99448 8.99724 7.44207 8.99724 7.99586V13.9966ZM12.0014 17.0007C12.0014 17.5545 11.5538 18.0021 11 18.0021C10.4462 18.0021 9.99862 17.5545 9.99862 17.0007V4.99931C9.99862 4.44552 10.4462 3.99793 11 3.99793C11.5538 3.99793 12.0014 4.44552 12.0014 4.99931V17.0007ZM14.9979 13.9966C14.9979 14.5503 14.5503 14.9979 13.9966 14.9979C13.4428 14.9979 12.9952 14.5503 12.9952 13.9966V7.99586C12.9952 7.44207 13.4428 6.99448 13.9966 6.99448C14.5503 6.99448 14.9979 7.44207 14.9979 7.99586V13.9966ZM18.0021 12.0014C18.0021 12.5552 17.5545 13.0028 17.0007 13.0028C16.4469 13.0028 15.9993 12.5552 15.9993 12.0014V9.99862C15.9993 9.44483 16.4469 8.99724 17.0007 8.99724C17.5545 8.99724 18.0021 9.44483 18.0021 9.99862V12.0014Z\"\/><\/svg><span class=\"responsivevoice-button__label\"><\/span><\/button> <br \/>\n<strong>Quito (Pichincha), 02 de febrero de 2024.- <\/strong>La Sala de lo Penal de la Corte Provincial de Justicia de Pichincha revoc\u00f3 el fallo de primera instancia, en el que Eduardo F. fue declarado inocente del delito de secuestro extorsivo.<\/p>\n<p>Fiscal\u00eda apel\u00f3 esa resoluci\u00f3n ante los jueces de segunda instancia, al considerar que no hubo una correcta valoraci\u00f3n de la prueba por parte del Tribunal de Garant\u00edas Penales.<br \/>\n<br \/>\n<button class=\"responsivevoice-button\" type=\"button\" title=\"ResponsiveVoice Tap to Start\/Stop Speech\" data-rvtts-action=\"speak\" data-rvtts-text=\"Luego de escuchar a las partes procesales, la Corte acept\u00f3 el recurso de apelaci\u00f3n interpuesto por la Fiscal Especializada en Delincuencia Organizada Transnacional e Internacional (Fedoti 5), imponi\u00e9ndole a Eduardo F. la pena m\u00e1xima agravada de diecisiete a\u00f1os con cuatro meses, al encontrarlo responsable del delito de secuestro extorsivo, registrado el 18 de noviembre de 2021, en el sur de Quito. En el relato expuesto en la audiencia de apelaci\u00f3n, la Fiscal de la causa record\u00f3 que en el juicio, el procesado present\u00f3 como prueba un certificado emitido por un m\u00e9dico particular, con el que pretendi\u00f3 justificar una aparente enfermedad mental. Este documento sirvi\u00f3 para que el Tribunal lo califique como una persona inimputable.\" data-rvtts-voice=\"Spanish Latin American Female\" data-rvtts-brand-url=\"https:\/\/responsivevoice.org\/?utm_source=wordpress-plugin&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=powered-by\" data-rvtts-brand-label=\"Powered by ResponsiveVoice\"><svg class=\"rvtts-icon\" width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"currentColor\" aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" clip-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M11 0C4.92345 0 0 4.92345 0 11C0 13.2683 0.690345 15.3772 1.86621 17.1221L0.811724 21.0517L4.70345 20.0124C6.48621 21.2641 8.65586 22 11 22C17.0766 22 22 17.0766 22 11C22 4.92345 17.0766 0 11 0ZM3.99793 9.99862C3.99793 9.44483 4.44552 8.99724 4.99931 8.99724C5.5531 8.99724 6.00069 9.44483 6.00069 9.99862V12.0014C6.00069 12.5552 5.5531 13.0028 4.99931 13.0028C4.44552 13.0028 3.99793 12.5552 3.99793 12.0014V9.99862ZM8.99724 13.9966C8.99724 14.5503 8.54966 14.9979 7.99586 14.9979C7.44207 14.9979 6.99448 14.5503 6.99448 13.9966V7.99586C6.99448 7.44207 7.44207 6.99448 7.99586 6.99448C8.54966 6.99448 8.99724 7.44207 8.99724 7.99586V13.9966ZM12.0014 17.0007C12.0014 17.5545 11.5538 18.0021 11 18.0021C10.4462 18.0021 9.99862 17.5545 9.99862 17.0007V4.99931C9.99862 4.44552 10.4462 3.99793 11 3.99793C11.5538 3.99793 12.0014 4.44552 12.0014 4.99931V17.0007ZM14.9979 13.9966C14.9979 14.5503 14.5503 14.9979 13.9966 14.9979C13.4428 14.9979 12.9952 14.5503 12.9952 13.9966V7.99586C12.9952 7.44207 13.4428 6.99448 13.9966 6.99448C14.5503 6.99448 14.9979 7.44207 14.9979 7.99586V13.9966ZM18.0021 12.0014C18.0021 12.5552 17.5545 13.0028 17.0007 13.0028C16.4469 13.0028 15.9993 12.5552 15.9993 12.0014V9.99862C15.9993 9.44483 16.4469 8.99724 17.0007 8.99724C17.5545 8.99724 18.0021 9.44483 18.0021 9.99862V12.0014Z\"\/><\/svg><span class=\"responsivevoice-button__label\"><\/span><\/button> <br \/>\nLuego de escuchar a las partes procesales, la Corte acept\u00f3 el recurso de apelaci\u00f3n interpuesto por la Fiscal Especializada en Delincuencia Organizada Transnacional e Internacional (Fedoti 5), imponi\u00e9ndole a Eduardo F. la pena m\u00e1xima agravada de diecisiete a\u00f1os con cuatro meses, al encontrarlo responsable del delito de secuestro extorsivo, registrado el 18 de noviembre de 2021, en el sur de Quito.<\/p>\n<p>En el relato expuesto en la audiencia de apelaci\u00f3n, la Fiscal de la causa record\u00f3 que en el juicio, el procesado present\u00f3 como prueba un certificado emitido por un m\u00e9dico particular, con el que pretendi\u00f3 justificar una aparente enfermedad mental. Este documento sirvi\u00f3 para que el Tribunal lo califique como una persona inimputable.<br \/>\n<br \/>\n<button class=\"responsivevoice-button\" type=\"button\" title=\"ResponsiveVoice Tap to Start\/Stop Speech\" data-rvtts-action=\"speak\" data-rvtts-text=\"Al fundamentar el recurso de apelaci\u00f3n, Fiscal\u00eda mencion\u00f3 que los jueces de primera instancia no valoraron correctamente tres pericias practicadas por una trabajadora social, un psic\u00f3logo y un psiquiatra. Estas experticias determinaron que Eduardo F. act\u00faa con conciencia y voluntad. Aunque la valoraci\u00f3n psiqui\u00e1trica identific\u00f3 en Eduardo F. un \u201ctrastorno disocial\u201d a causa del consumo de drogas, la pericia tambi\u00e9n concluy\u00f3 que esta puede ser tratada en un centro de rehabilitaci\u00f3n.\" data-rvtts-voice=\"Spanish Latin American Female\" data-rvtts-brand-url=\"https:\/\/responsivevoice.org\/?utm_source=wordpress-plugin&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=powered-by\" data-rvtts-brand-label=\"Powered by ResponsiveVoice\"><svg class=\"rvtts-icon\" width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"currentColor\" aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" clip-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M11 0C4.92345 0 0 4.92345 0 11C0 13.2683 0.690345 15.3772 1.86621 17.1221L0.811724 21.0517L4.70345 20.0124C6.48621 21.2641 8.65586 22 11 22C17.0766 22 22 17.0766 22 11C22 4.92345 17.0766 0 11 0ZM3.99793 9.99862C3.99793 9.44483 4.44552 8.99724 4.99931 8.99724C5.5531 8.99724 6.00069 9.44483 6.00069 9.99862V12.0014C6.00069 12.5552 5.5531 13.0028 4.99931 13.0028C4.44552 13.0028 3.99793 12.5552 3.99793 12.0014V9.99862ZM8.99724 13.9966C8.99724 14.5503 8.54966 14.9979 7.99586 14.9979C7.44207 14.9979 6.99448 14.5503 6.99448 13.9966V7.99586C6.99448 7.44207 7.44207 6.99448 7.99586 6.99448C8.54966 6.99448 8.99724 7.44207 8.99724 7.99586V13.9966ZM12.0014 17.0007C12.0014 17.5545 11.5538 18.0021 11 18.0021C10.4462 18.0021 9.99862 17.5545 9.99862 17.0007V4.99931C9.99862 4.44552 10.4462 3.99793 11 3.99793C11.5538 3.99793 12.0014 4.44552 12.0014 4.99931V17.0007ZM14.9979 13.9966C14.9979 14.5503 14.5503 14.9979 13.9966 14.9979C13.4428 14.9979 12.9952 14.5503 12.9952 13.9966V7.99586C12.9952 7.44207 13.4428 6.99448 13.9966 6.99448C14.5503 6.99448 14.9979 7.44207 14.9979 7.99586V13.9966ZM18.0021 12.0014C18.0021 12.5552 17.5545 13.0028 17.0007 13.0028C16.4469 13.0028 15.9993 12.5552 15.9993 12.0014V9.99862C15.9993 9.44483 16.4469 8.99724 17.0007 8.99724C17.5545 8.99724 18.0021 9.44483 18.0021 9.99862V12.0014Z\"\/><\/svg><span class=\"responsivevoice-button__label\"><\/span><\/button> <br \/>\nAl fundamentar el recurso de apelaci\u00f3n, Fiscal\u00eda mencion\u00f3 que los jueces de primera instancia no valoraron correctamente tres pericias practicadas por una trabajadora social, un psic\u00f3logo y un psiquiatra. Estas experticias determinaron que Eduardo F. act\u00faa con conciencia y voluntad.<\/p>\n<p>Aunque la valoraci\u00f3n psiqui\u00e1trica identific\u00f3 en Eduardo F. un \u201ctrastorno disocial\u201d a causa del consumo de drogas, la pericia tambi\u00e9n concluy\u00f3 que esta puede ser tratada en un centro de rehabilitaci\u00f3n.<br \/>\n<br \/>\n<button class=\"responsivevoice-button\" type=\"button\" title=\"ResponsiveVoice Tap to Start\/Stop Speech\" data-rvtts-action=\"speak\" data-rvtts-text=\"Con estos argumentos, la Sala revoc\u00f3 el fallo de primera instancia, d\u00e1ndole la raz\u00f3n a Fiscal\u00eda. Por el secuestro extorsivo el Tribunal de Garant\u00edas Penales s\u00ed sentenci\u00f3 a Kevin C. y Jonathan S., conden\u00e1ndolos a una privaci\u00f3n de libertad de diecisiete a\u00f1os y cuatro meses; y cinco a\u00f1os con siete meses, respectivamente. La v\u00edctima, que permaneci\u00f3 siete d\u00edas cautiva, fue liberada tras un operativo dirigido por Fedoti No.5 en el Valle de Los Chillos, el 25 de noviembre de 2021. El denunciante fue torturado durante el tiempo que estuvo secuestrado.\" data-rvtts-voice=\"Spanish Latin American Female\" data-rvtts-brand-url=\"https:\/\/responsivevoice.org\/?utm_source=wordpress-plugin&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=powered-by\" data-rvtts-brand-label=\"Powered by ResponsiveVoice\"><svg class=\"rvtts-icon\" width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"currentColor\" aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" clip-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M11 0C4.92345 0 0 4.92345 0 11C0 13.2683 0.690345 15.3772 1.86621 17.1221L0.811724 21.0517L4.70345 20.0124C6.48621 21.2641 8.65586 22 11 22C17.0766 22 22 17.0766 22 11C22 4.92345 17.0766 0 11 0ZM3.99793 9.99862C3.99793 9.44483 4.44552 8.99724 4.99931 8.99724C5.5531 8.99724 6.00069 9.44483 6.00069 9.99862V12.0014C6.00069 12.5552 5.5531 13.0028 4.99931 13.0028C4.44552 13.0028 3.99793 12.5552 3.99793 12.0014V9.99862ZM8.99724 13.9966C8.99724 14.5503 8.54966 14.9979 7.99586 14.9979C7.44207 14.9979 6.99448 14.5503 6.99448 13.9966V7.99586C6.99448 7.44207 7.44207 6.99448 7.99586 6.99448C8.54966 6.99448 8.99724 7.44207 8.99724 7.99586V13.9966ZM12.0014 17.0007C12.0014 17.5545 11.5538 18.0021 11 18.0021C10.4462 18.0021 9.99862 17.5545 9.99862 17.0007V4.99931C9.99862 4.44552 10.4462 3.99793 11 3.99793C11.5538 3.99793 12.0014 4.44552 12.0014 4.99931V17.0007ZM14.9979 13.9966C14.9979 14.5503 14.5503 14.9979 13.9966 14.9979C13.4428 14.9979 12.9952 14.5503 12.9952 13.9966V7.99586C12.9952 7.44207 13.4428 6.99448 13.9966 6.99448C14.5503 6.99448 14.9979 7.44207 14.9979 7.99586V13.9966ZM18.0021 12.0014C18.0021 12.5552 17.5545 13.0028 17.0007 13.0028C16.4469 13.0028 15.9993 12.5552 15.9993 12.0014V9.99862C15.9993 9.44483 16.4469 8.99724 17.0007 8.99724C17.5545 8.99724 18.0021 9.44483 18.0021 9.99862V12.0014Z\"\/><\/svg><span class=\"responsivevoice-button__label\"><\/span><\/button> <br \/>\nCon estos argumentos, la Sala revoc\u00f3 el fallo de primera instancia, d\u00e1ndole la raz\u00f3n a Fiscal\u00eda.<\/p>\n<p>Por el secuestro extorsivo el Tribunal de Garant\u00edas Penales s\u00ed sentenci\u00f3 a Kevin C. y Jonathan S., conden\u00e1ndolos a una privaci\u00f3n de libertad de diecisiete a\u00f1os y cuatro meses; y cinco a\u00f1os con siete meses, respectivamente.<\/p>\n<p>La v\u00edctima, que permaneci\u00f3 siete d\u00edas cautiva, fue liberada tras un operativo dirigido por Fedoti No.5 en el Valle de Los Chillos, el 25 de noviembre de 2021. El denunciante fue torturado durante el tiempo que estuvo secuestrado.<br \/>\n<br \/>\n<button class=\"responsivevoice-button\" type=\"button\" title=\"ResponsiveVoice Tap to Start\/Stop Speech\" data-rvtts-action=\"speak\" data-rvtts-text=\"Informaci\u00f3n de contacto: Direcci\u00f3n de Comunicaci\u00f3n Social comunicacionsocial@fiscalia.gob.ec Tel\u00e9fono:\u00a03985800 Ext. 173123\" data-rvtts-voice=\"Spanish Latin American Female\" data-rvtts-brand-url=\"https:\/\/responsivevoice.org\/?utm_source=wordpress-plugin&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=powered-by\" data-rvtts-brand-label=\"Powered by ResponsiveVoice\"><svg class=\"rvtts-icon\" width=\"22\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 22 22\" fill=\"currentColor\" aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\"><path fill-rule=\"evenodd\" clip-rule=\"evenodd\" d=\"M11 0C4.92345 0 0 4.92345 0 11C0 13.2683 0.690345 15.3772 1.86621 17.1221L0.811724 21.0517L4.70345 20.0124C6.48621 21.2641 8.65586 22 11 22C17.0766 22 22 17.0766 22 11C22 4.92345 17.0766 0 11 0ZM3.99793 9.99862C3.99793 9.44483 4.44552 8.99724 4.99931 8.99724C5.5531 8.99724 6.00069 9.44483 6.00069 9.99862V12.0014C6.00069 12.5552 5.5531 13.0028 4.99931 13.0028C4.44552 13.0028 3.99793 12.5552 3.99793 12.0014V9.99862ZM8.99724 13.9966C8.99724 14.5503 8.54966 14.9979 7.99586 14.9979C7.44207 14.9979 6.99448 14.5503 6.99448 13.9966V7.99586C6.99448 7.44207 7.44207 6.99448 7.99586 6.99448C8.54966 6.99448 8.99724 7.44207 8.99724 7.99586V13.9966ZM12.0014 17.0007C12.0014 17.5545 11.5538 18.0021 11 18.0021C10.4462 18.0021 9.99862 17.5545 9.99862 17.0007V4.99931C9.99862 4.44552 10.4462 3.99793 11 3.99793C11.5538 3.99793 12.0014 4.44552 12.0014 4.99931V17.0007ZM14.9979 13.9966C14.9979 14.5503 14.5503 14.9979 13.9966 14.9979C13.4428 14.9979 12.9952 14.5503 12.9952 13.9966V7.99586C12.9952 7.44207 13.4428 6.99448 13.9966 6.99448C14.5503 6.99448 14.9979 7.44207 14.9979 7.99586V13.9966ZM18.0021 12.0014C18.0021 12.5552 17.5545 13.0028 17.0007 13.0028C16.4469 13.0028 15.9993 12.5552 15.9993 12.0014V9.99862C15.9993 9.44483 16.4469 8.99724 17.0007 8.99724C17.5545 8.99724 18.0021 9.44483 18.0021 9.99862V12.0014Z\"\/><\/svg><span class=\"responsivevoice-button__label\"><\/span><\/button> <br \/>\n<strong>Informaci\u00f3n de contacto:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Direcci\u00f3n de Comunicaci\u00f3n Social<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"mailto:comunicacionsocial@fiscalia.gob.ec\">comunicacionsocial@fiscalia.gob.ec<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Tel\u00e9fono:<\/strong>\u00a03985800 Ext. 173123<br \/>\n<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"BOLET\u00cdN DE PRENSA FGE N\u00ba 149-DC-2024 En apelaci\u00f3n, Fiscal\u00eda logra sentencia de 17 a\u00f1os por secuestro extorsivo Quito (Pichincha), 02 de febrero de 2024.- La Sala de lo Penal de la Corte Provincial de Justicia de Pichincha revoc\u00f3 el fallo de primera instancia, en el...","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2262,2260],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-52690","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-febrero-2024","category-2260"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52690","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=52690"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52690\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":52694,"href":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52690\/revisions\/52694"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=52690"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=52690"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.fiscalia.gob.ec\/accesibilidad\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=52690"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}